Friday, September 4, 2020

One Way Analysis of Variance Essay Example for Free

One Way Analysis of Variance Essay Single direction Analysis of Variance (Abridged single direction ANOVA) is a procedure used to think about methods for at least two examples (utilizing the F conveyance). This strategy can be utilized uniquely for numerical information. It comprises of a solitary factor with a few levels and numerous perceptions at each level. With this sort of format we can ascertain the mean of the perceptions inside each degree of our factor. The residuals will tell about the variety inside each level. It can likewise average the methods for each level to get a great mean. And afterward take a gander at the deviation of the mean of each level from the stupendous intend to comprehend something about the level impacts. At long last, can contrast the variety inside levels with the variety across levels. Thus the name investigation of change. Used to decide if there are any huge contrasts between the methods for at least three free (irrelevant) gatherings. It tests the invalid speculation that examples in at least two gatherings are drawn from populaces with a similar mean qualities. What's more, analyzes the methods between the gatherings you are keen on and decides if any of those methods are altogether not the same as one another. Equation F= q MSBMSWWhere: F = Fisher’s Ratio K = Number of Columns N = Total Number of things MSB= SSBK-1 MSW= SSWN-K Perspectives of the first, second, third and fourth year EHS understudies towards their PC subject Attitude| Year| Average Weighted Mean| Rank| | 1st| 2nd| 3rd| 4th| | Study regularly| 3.44| 3.37| 3.50| 3.56| 3.47| 9| Normally practice the skills| 3.73| 3.88| 3.65| 3.58| 3.71| 6.5| Listen mindfully during class discussion| 3.62| 3.71| 3.67| 3.85| 3.71| 6.5| Always do the task without hesitation| 3.63| 3.73| 3.83| 3.75| 5| Always chip away at ventures without hesitation| 3.94| 4.10| 4.12| 4.00| 4.04| 2| Enjoy the hands-on activity| 4.13| 4.38| 4.06| 4.25| 4.21| 1| Search and utilize other PC reference| 3.83| 3.54| 3.92| 3.78| 4| Always record highlights during discussion| 3.67| 3.77| 4.04| 3.79| 3| Ask questions at whatever point the theme is unclear| 3.37| 3.38| 3.54| 3.63| 3.48| 8| Likeability of the subject| 2.98| 3.62| 3.12| 3.25| 3.24| 10| | Amazing Means| 3.63| 3.77| 3.68| 3.79| 3.72| The table shows the synopsis of the mentalities of the EHS understudies towards their PC subject. Having registered the Average Weighted Means, Rank 1 is pointer f, which is â€Å"I make the most of our hands-on activities† with a normal mean of 4.21. The Last position goes to pointer j, which is â€Å"I like my PC subject†, with a normal mean of 3.24. This shows the EHS understudies don't care for their PC subject. In spite of the fact that the third year enjoys their PC subject, they are just a small amount of the entire which don't care for their PC subject. This further demonstrates the understudies show inspirational disposition towards their PC subject due to the amazing weighted mean of 3.72. This connotes despite the fact that they don't care for their PC subject, they despite everything show uplifting disposition for they have most of the markers. Reference Anonymous.August 23,2013.One-route examination of difference. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_analysis_of_variance Anonymous.August 23,2013.One-way ANOVA. https://statistics.laerd.com/factual aides/single direction anova-measurable guide.php Anonymous.August 23,2013.One-Way ANOVA. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ppc/section2/ppc231.htm

Sunday, August 23, 2020

Negotiation Strategy Article Analysis Paper Essay Example For Students

3 Steps to Acing Your Upcoming Group Interview You’ve been approached in for a board meet. Perhaps you’re threatened. Perhaps frightened. Possibly you’re not even sure you comprehend what that really involves. Whatever your degree of fear, here are three simple strides to traversing your board meet tranquilly and in one piece. Stage 1: BEFOREYou reserve the privilege to ask who will be on your board. Do this. At that point inquire about each board part as well as could be expected. You’ll have the option to make sense of a considerable amount and get ready better for what each may be generally quick to ask you. What does this specific gathering of individuals educate you regarding what the organization is attempting to assess?You can likewise ask to what extent (generally) the meeting should last. This will give you a nice sentiment for what amount to and fro conversation will be conceivable, how much space you’ll be given to pose inquiries, to what extent your answers can be, etc.Step 2: DURING Treat every individual on the board like an individual not simply one more anonymous face. This isn't an indifferent divider asking you inquiries. Every questioner on your board is another chance to make a human association and persuade that a lot more individuals in the organization what an extraordinary fit you would be.Be sure to observe everybody’s name as they are presented. Record every one if that causes you recall. When responding to questions, talk straightforwardly to the person who asked, yet then attempt to widen your answer out to cause the remainder of the board to feel remembered for the discussion.Step 3: AFTERYou’ve took in their names and put forth an attempt to interface with each board part presently thank every single one of them earnestly withâ solid eye to eye connection and a quality handshake. From that point forward, it’s the typical post-meet follow-up methodology. Be that as it may, recall that you have to keep in touch with one card to say thanks for each board part. It appears to be a torment, however it’s these little contacts that will help set you apart.The board talk with: 6 hints for previously, during, and after

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Richard III: Power of Language and Own Villainy

Distorted in body and bent at the top of the priority list, Richard is inside and out the prevailing character of the play, to the degree that he is both the play’s hero and significant reprobate. He is egotistical, underhanded, degenerate, perverted, and manipulative. His knowledge, political brightness, and stunning utilization of language keeps the crowd intrigued and his subjects and opponents under his influence. Toward the start of the play, it is clarified to the crowd that Richard has no legitimization for holding onto the seat. This is on the grounds that England is clearly not abused or subject to oppression as the extensive common war has quite recently finished, and Richard’s most seasoned sibling, King Edward IV, presently sits on the seat. Richard himself, expresses that ‘All the mists that loured upon our house’ (1. 1, 3), the place of York, has been dissipated by the ‘son of York’ (1. 1, 2), King Edward IV. In any case, Richard means to agitate the realm by holding onto influence for himself. He says that ‘since I can't demonstrate a darling to engage these reasonable expressive days, I am resolved to demonstrate a villain’ (1. , 28). This basically implies since Richard was not made to be a darling, he has no utilization for harmony, and will cheerfully crush harmony with his violations. This shows Richard’s brazen satisfaction in his own villainy as he can so happily hurl aside everything that the remainder of humankind values. Richard III is an extraordinary investigation of the brain science of malice, and that investigation is fixated on the operations of Richard’s mind and the techniques he uses to control, control, and harm others for his own benefit. Maybe more than some other play by Shakespeare, the crowd of Richard III encounters a perplexing, uncertain, and exceptionally unpredictable relationship with the fundamental character. Richard is obviously a scalawag as he pronounces inside and out in his absolute first discourse that he means to remain determined to accomplish his definitive objective of turning out to be above all else. In any case, in spite of his open faithfulness to underhanded, he has such an alluring and captivating character that, for a great part of the play, we are probably going to feel for him, or are at any rate intrigued by him. Along these lines, our relationship with Richard mirrors the other characters’ associations with him, passing on an amazing feeling of the power of his character. Indeed, even characters, for example, Lady Anne, who have an unequivocal information on his insidiousness, disregard his deceptive nature and brutal conduct and permit themselves to be allured by his splendid pleasantry, his skilful argumentation, and his constant quest for his narrow minded wants. Richard’s long, interesting soliloquys, in which he traces his arrangements and joyously admits all his malevolent contemplations, are vital to the audience’s experience of Richard. Shakespeare utilizes these soliloquys splendidly to control the audience’s impression of Richard, empowering this manipulative hero to work his appeal on the crowd. In Act I, scene I, for instance, Richard offers an appearance for his villainy towards others by calling attention to that he is disliked, and that he is disliked in view of his physical disfigurement. Richard himself is fiercely genuine about his appearance. He confesses to being defectively molded and reprimands untimely birth for his condition. He realizes that he is ‘not molded for sportive tricks’ (1. 1, 14) and keeping in mind that others have a great time ‘an loving looking glass’ (1. , 14), his deformed body makes a ‘shadow in the sun’ (1. 1, 26) that estranges him from others. Consequently, Lady Anne calls Richard a ‘lump of foul deformity’ (1. 2, 57) in Act I, scene ii. This demonstrates Richard’s guarantee not just causes different characters of the play to appear the reprobates for rebuffing him for his appearance, yet in addition makes it simple for the crowd to identify with Richard during the principal scenes of the play and even expectation that he will prevail regardless of his undeniable villainy. It rapidly gets clear, be that as it may, that Richard essentially utilizes his deformation as an apparatus to pick up the compassion of others, including the crowd. This is as of now observable in his absolute first discourse as Richard appears to take a conscious unreasonable thoroughly enjoy his outward shape. He picks words, for example, ‘cheated’, ‘deformed’, ‘unfinished’, ‘half made up’, ‘dogs bark’ at him as he passes by as a result of his ‘deformity’ to portray himself. Richard’s shameless villainy is a substantially more normal piece of his character than basic sharpness about his terrible body. In any case, he despite everything figures out how to utilize discourse to win our trust, and he rehashes this all through his battle to be delegated lord. An intriguing optional topic of Richard III is the influence of language, or the significance of language in accomplishing political influence. Language may not generally be an essential instrument of influence, however for Richard, it is a vital weapon. As we have seen, it is with his uncommon aptitudes with words that permits him to scorn, affront, insult and beguile all who hinder him to control. Richard’s ability with language and contention is the thing that empowers him to charm Lady Anne, have Clarence tossed behind bars and reprimand the ruler for Clarence’s passing, all at almost no hazard to himself. Taking everything into account, I feel Richard III’s shameless delight in both the influence of language and his own villainy makes him a character deserving of both regard and profound respect, and in this way I totally concur with this announcement. This is on the grounds that Richard’s audacious influence of language flaunts the quick mind and scholarly keenness of the character, on-screen character and dramatist, while his own villainy makes the play all the additionally entrancing and engaging as his shocking demonstrations become all the more chilling.

Friday, August 21, 2020

Logic Free Essays

Is correspondence e cows without the intelligent connectives, for example, or, ND, infers, not, if and just if ? [200 words] 5. Why we treat scientific realities as certain? Why in rationale we me-aphasia on autologies† 2 as opposed to inconsistencies? [200 words] (Consistency) a quality of a legitimate framework that Is comprised to such an extent that none of the suggestions deducible from the aphorisms repudiate each other 4. [n] †an amicable consistency or understanding among things or parts Tautology: an explanation that is essentially evident (like 2+2-4) 1 6. We will compose a custom exposition test on Rationale or then again any comparative subject just for you Request Now What's going on with the accompanying contention? The more you study, the more you learn. The more you learn, the more you know. The more you know, the more you overlook. The more you overlook, the less you know. The less you know, the less you learn. Things being what they are, the reason study? 7. Break down the accompanying contention: God is All Powerful, supreme and omniscient. On the off chance that God can do anything, would he be able to make something that even He can’t an and so forth? (e: A stone so overwhelming that He can’t lift It) God can do whatever Is Possible. Indeed, even God can’t accomplish something that Is unrealistic to be done Can God make a stone so substantial that even He can not lift it? 8. In a brutal extremist nation a guiltless individual is captured on Sunday night and Marilyn sentenced to execution, which they are told will occur on one of the accompanying eve mornings. To exacerbate the situation, they are informed that they won't know the day preceding which morning it will be. Following a few hours torment the detainee comes up short into a quiet rest as they understand that such a danger can't be done. They contemplated therefore: The execution can't happen on Friday morning; for on the off chance that they are as yet alive on Thursday night, at that point the execution must occur on Friday. In any case, they were informed that they would not know the day preceding which day it would be. So it can't be Friday, thus Friday can be considered out a chance. Yet, by a similar thinking it can't be Thursday either. For in the event that they are as yet alive on Wednesday night, at that point the execution must occur on Thursday. In any case, they were informed that they would not know the day preceding which day it would be. So it can't be Thursday, thus Thursday can be considered out a chance. Be that as it may, by a similar thinking it can't be Wednesday either†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. A similar thinking covers Wednesday, Tuesday and Monday thus the detainee can have a sound evenings rest. The detainee is, in any case, enormously shocked to ND themselves confronting the killer on Wednesday (or for sure some other) morning. What turned out badly with the prisoner’s thinking? Record the means obviously and show how conundrum 3 emerges in the above circumstance? Mystery: A clearly stable contention prompting a logical inconsistency. Some well known 2 PHI 142: Introduction to Logic Mid Semester Exam Date: 19 February 2013 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Kanata Answer the entirety of the accompanying inquiries. Compose answers in a different booklet. Max. Imprints: 30 Time: 2 hours; 17. 30-19. 30 PM We may characterize confidence as the firm faith in something for which there is no proof. Where there is proof, nobody talks about . We don't discuss confidence that two and two are four or that the earth is round. We possibly talk about confidence when we wish to substitute feeling for proof. †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ Bertrand Russell Answer whether the accompanying proclamations are True or False. Legitimize it incline toward capably with a short answer. 1. The accompanying contention is substantial: If PCs can reason, they can pose inquiries. PCs can reason. In this way, PCs can pose inquiries . The accompanying contention is an occurrence of Fallacy of mishap false notion . † Oh my master, don’t take any courses in the science office not even as open elective, as they are extremely intense and horrible. I took EBBS:322 and it was a debacle. † 3. The absolute recommendations, All who are non keen are non-understudies and all who are undergrads are shrewd are opposing to one another 4. I am certain that you will concur that we ought not cast a ballot Mr.. Panky Saxons for the following presidential races in this inn. On the off chance that he gets chose, we will all be denied of mother of the benefits that we are getting a charge out of as of now. Anybody not concurring with this will be terminated quickly from this wing A-top. In the above contention, the arguer is supposed to submit misrepresentation error. 5. Bogus Cause misrepresentation is submitted when the end lays on the assumption of a causal connection between two wonders, when in certainty the sum total of what that has been indicated is a relationship. No ideas are expressive instincts on abhorrence changes over to All ideas are non-expressive instincts 7. The all out recommendations, All rationale understudies are brilliant individuals No rationale understudies are non-splendid individuals re opposing to one another. 8. The accompanying contention is invalid If Newton’s hypothesis is right, at that point light ought not be redirected by gravity. In this examination, we can see that light is avoided by gravity. Accordingly, Newton’s hypothesis isn't right PHI 142: Introduction to Logic Mid Semester Exam Date: 19 February 2013 2. Which of the accompanying sections contains contentions and which are not I. E. , Non-contentions 1 . On the off chance that there is one subject that will be the subject of computerized business this year, it is versatile. Business, which tracks Web and portable utilization, distributed a report about what hap-need in 2012, and what's in store in 2013. It shows that the impacts of a development toward portable are all over the place, from shopping to media to look. As indicated by the report, â€Å"2013 could spell a rough financial transition,† and organizations should scramble to remain in front of customers evolving conduct (whenever. Com). 2. Standard glass is soft drink lime glass and is a blend of silicates of sodium, potassium, calcium and aluminum and so forth. It is fragile on the grounds that its atomic structure is made out of tetrahedral precious stones. These precious stones don't have a decent enormous territory precise resealing structure. 3. Individuals are not free, albeit human opportunity has been exceptionally prized since our commencement. Its worth is insisted by strict tenets. Common and criminal Justice frameworks join the possibility that conduct is openly picked into condemning rules. Plainly it has been a significant idea in numerous territories of human action. 3. Recognize the kind of Fallacy of Weak Induction from the accompanying contentions 1 . I broke the greater part of my essential tests (board tests) before while wearing my green tea shirt and composing a test with my parker pen. In this manner, green shading tea enlist with a parker pen is a fortunate blend and brought parcel of accomplishment. Subsequently I ought not neglect to take it when I go for a test again for making progress in the test. 2. On the off chance that once a man entertains himself with murder, very soon he comes to barely care about burglarizing; and from looting he comes close to drinking and Sabbath breaking, and from that to incivility and delaying. When start upon this descending way, no one can really tell where you are to stop. Numerous a man has dated his ruin from some homicide or other that maybe he barely cared about at that point. 3. Popular scholar William Palely contention from configuration recommends that a watch and the universe are comparable as both presentation request and unpredictability. On the off chance that request and intricacy comprise proof of structure on account of a watch, however, at that point they should likewise establish proof of the result of keen plan that the universe must be a result of shrewd plan as well. 4. In 1742, Christian Goldberg guessed that each much number more noteworthy than 2 is the total of two primes. Mathematicians have been attempting to demonstrate Schoolbag’s guess from that point onward, however nobody has prevailing with regards to doing as such. After more than two sections, I figure we can securely presume that Goldberg wasn't right. 4. Recognize the sort of Fallacies of Relevance 4 submitted by the accompanying contentions. Legitimize your answer with a concise clarification 1 . Government disability mature age benefits guarantee you can resign with pride. In the event that you become harmed or can't work, Social Security handicap advantages will help keep you above water. Be that as it may, Mrs.. Sheila’s contentions against cuts in Social Security are useless. As a beneficiary of Social Security benefits, she would normally be relied upon to contend precisely the manner in which she does. Page 2 of 4 Step by step instructions to refer to Logic, Papers

Enterprises free essay sample

The sprouting business person Sam Marcus alongside speculator Mr. Walter saw the capability of dynamic development in Mike’s bureau making organization and bought a little multi year old bureau making organization from its author multi year sooner. The organization contended in fundamentally two portions, business and private development markets. Sam imagined the organization to develop to 70 Million in deals by 2007. Despite the fact that business showcase offered the development opportunity, the working cycles were unbending a direct result of offering process which just has 32 % achievement proportion. Then again, the private market was little however has the ‘got’ proportion of 70 %. The case raised many fascinating realities about the estimation of the client for an association point of view. Blackstone being the greatest client offered yearly deals of around 2. 4 % to CMR, however does this relationship offered any worth add to the CMR? At long last Sam Marcus must conclude whether to proceed with this relationship without expanding costs or to build costs along these lines compromising a relationship with CMR’s greatest client. We will compose a custom paper test on Undertakings or on the other hand any comparative subject explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Relationship with Blackstone: Obviously, starting a relationship with the Blackstone was a finished key fit for the CMR ventures. CMR needed to build its income multiple times in coming 10 years by making an adaptable and replicable plan of action. Blackstone won't just offer CMR high volume of deals yet in addition will give them the solid a dependable balance in the private piece of the overall industry. All the more in this way, considering forceful development technique, union with the Blackstone will allowed CMR a chance to normalize its business forms so as to profit by improved operational efficiencies that comes on account of size of activities. The accompanying figuring indicates quantitative estimation of relationship of dark stone for CMR undertakings. Blackstone commitment towards the CMR for year 1998 Fiscal year 1998 | Revenue| Total Residential | 1596000| Blackstone Contribution| 210314| % of commitment in Residential Segment | 13. 17757| Es CM | 65,344| Though the commitment of the business given by Blackstone gives a positive commitment edge to the matter of $ 65344, however regarding the definite estimation notice in the exhibit1, the relationship hurts the CMR primary concern once the SGamp;A costs were considered. The general impact was negative 3,444 which obviously imply that CMR has lost cash on this record. Obviously I accept this wasn’t the situation when Sam chose to start the relationship with Blackstone. So what turned out badly and where for CMR? CMR relationship with Blackstone disintegrated after some time due to the different usage challenges that emerges over the long haul. CMR couldn't gather the operational efficiencies which they figured they would accomplish, as for instance, mortgage holders were all the while visiting showrooms of CMR for which CMR must have a sales rep accessible in stores to serve them. Also, neither CMR and nor Blackstone had the option to restrain the inclusion of the property holders in the structure stage, which again costs cash to CMR. Likewise, as mortgage holders were working with numerous other sub-contractual workers, it made a task â€coordination issue for both CMR and Blackstone, bringing about a minute ago structure changes. Such changes involve a minute ago operations on assembling process and regularly brings about loss of material and expands shop floor time and so on. Henceforth I accept, as a result of the previously mentioned reason, there exists a hole between the planned shop floor hours and the genuine shop floor hours put in at work. CMR will be correct in light of the fact that they can legitimize the cost increment however from the Blackstone point of view, any expansion in cost may results in non-conformance of the understanding that existed among CMR and Blackstone. Ensuing to my comprehension of the previously mentioned issues, referenced beneath are a portion of my proposals that can help CMR in improving the general client esteem chain. Improve the Operational Efficiency on the shop floor: As obvious from the information, CMR was unmistakably not working admirably in planning shop floor hours put in at work. It will be difficult to accept that a lot of 69 % of ominous change appeared in show 6 of case can be clarified by previously mentioned issues. In this way, my hunch is that either the Project Managers/Design engineers were not making right suspicions about a specific activity or the workforce is putting swelled numbers on the shop floor time spent on one specific employment. In both the cases, it is venture manager’s occupation to improve the operational effectiveness so as to lessen the contrast between the real and the planned hours. As clear from the computation referenced in the appended exhibit1 , if the incomes are to be determined just utilizing planned hours which implies just the moved hours are spent at work , CMR can get the positive 16% worth extra its EBIT/Revenues. Cost dependent on Actual shop floor hours spent in the Job : Going ahead, CMR can change its technique and can begin charging dependent on genuine time spent at work yet such a procedure involves a hazard that it will open up their edges to Blackstone which again can pound the costs. This is the cost increment choice, however the cost increment can be legitimized to the Blackstone the executives. In light of my count In Exhibit1 (If evaluated right Colum), utilizing such a procedure will again carry positive commitment edge to CMR endeavors. Improve venture coordination: As a significant part of the issues results from poor task coordination, having a solid understanding set up will give both CMR and Blackstone a preferred position if the other party neglects to convey on its guarantee. I suggest the punishment condition in the understanding if any gathering neglects to convey on its guarantees. CMR should settle on the understanding increasingly solid like constraining the no of changes, requiring adequate time to make changes, and pre spending endorsements before starting any change at work. Correspondingly from Blackstone point of view, they can punish CMR on late conveyance or unfair conveyance, characteristics issue, and so forth. By having a hazard and prize relationship, the undertaking coordination issues can be improved. CMR can specifically redistribute a few Jobs to various temporary worker: If CMR can’t get operational effectiveness into their organization on specific employments or in reality in general, what they can do is to enlist a subcontractor who can carry out the responsibility for them in significantly less cost. As opposed to losing a total business with Blackstone, what they can do is to single out which venture they would need to do and leave the rest for their subcontractors. Along these lines they can truly upgrade their endeavors and any dangers related with poor employments get moved to other sub-contractual workers. Increment the Prices: If CMR thinks they are correct and accepts that their cost doesn’t legitimize the measure of work required on the specific employment, they can feel free to build their costs up to the base whereby they can make the positive return. As referenced for the situation, the market will follow sooner than later.

Saturday, July 11, 2020

How to Write Essay Topics Using Romeo and Juliet Essay Topics

How to Write Essay Topics Using Romeo and Juliet Essay TopicsRomeo and Juliet essay topics are becoming more popular in English class. What is so great about them? They can help you have a greater level of understanding when you read the play, and they can also help you come up with creative ways to include some of the most memorable lines from the play into your own essay.The great thing about these essay topics is that there are a lot of options available for you to choose from. This allows you to create interesting and original sentences. What is even better is that there are dozens of choices that you can pick from to help spice up your own essay. However, you must make sure that you choose only those choices that you are confident will help you to express something that will hold a certain level of interest to your reader.So what are the different Romeo and Juliet essay topics available? Well, these topics vary greatly from topic to topic. For example, if you are having trouble coming up with topics for your essay, then this is a great place to start looking for ideas and you can easily use the internet as a source of ideas.Some people use poetry, a poem from the play, or an excerpt from the play to create their essay topics. There are others who use quotes from the play to help them convey ideas to their readers. You can also use a bit of prose to create a unique essay topic. If you would like to get more ideas, then you can visit the library and look at some literature related to the play, and see what kind of ideas you might be able to come up with based on what you have learned about the play.Another way to add some spice to your Romeo and Juliet essay topics is to use an image. While this does not give you as much insight into the play as a quote does, it will give you a fresh new idea for the essay topic that you might not have thought of. Also, if you have some artwork you like that you want to include with your essay, then you can do that too. Howe ver, make sure that you don't go to a large library and purchase any artwork that might be considered offensive or inappropriate. These images can really become distractions when you are trying to write the entire essay.One other idea to use is to learn something new. This could be anything from a concept that you learned from another student, to a new way of writing that you found while reading an interesting book. As long as you come up with something new that you can incorporate into your essay, then you can use it as a 'template' for your own essay. It doesn't matter if it is an idea that you come up with that works for your essay, or it is an interesting concept that you found while doing research. In either case, you will find that it makes it easier to come up with your own essay topic.A common theme that many students that are trying to come up with ideas for their essays, are using an image or a quote from the play as a template for their essay. While this might not be the best option for everyone, you can still use an image to help you come up with a decent starting point for your essay. Once you have created your own 'template,' you can then refine your idea and change it to something that you find more appealing. Of course, it is up to you as to how much you change the original piece of artwork to include in your essay.

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Technolosaurous Rex Crichton and Jurassic Park - Literature Essay Samples

An ancient world re-created on a private island. Plants and animals genetically engineered in secret. Man-made dinosaurs – living – towering as tall as buildings. Every once in a while comes a novel so enchanting that even the most skeptical of readers begin to believe in the possibility of its contents. Michael Crichton accomplishes just this in his thrilling novel, Jurassic Park. The scientific ideas and aspects integrated into this novel have such truth even today. While the creation of dinosaurs may seem a bit outlandish at first thought, this accomplishment isn’t far off from the nature defying discoveries our scientists are currently making. With recent advances in cloning, the astonishing ability of creating a life form, and geoengineering, the alteration of the very structure of our earth, it’s easy to see that science has opened up opportunities far beyond our comprehension. As Jurassic Park progresses, readers learn more about the advances and ha zards of modern technology and develop a sense of Crichton’s message that scientists are becoming more and more irrational and irresponsible; we as humans are essentially trying to â€Å"play God† and have lost our respect for nature entirely. Though Michael Crichton’s novel may be of the fictional persuasion, his ideas spark incredible debate in the scientific scene. The complexity and thoroughness of this novel hooks readers right from the start, and Crichton’s stylistic choices leave readers in suspense even after the very last page. This is largely due to Crichton’s ability to lay such a solid foundation to the plot of the novel. In the introduction, Crichton describes in detail the work of scientists in a particularly controversial field: biotechnology. Biotechnology is known as the exploitation of biological processes for purposes such as genetic manipulation. This type of technology is exactly what the scientists in Jurassic Park use to create their real life ancient creatures. The knowledge of biotechnology Crichton offers to his readers in the introduction is justification for the idea that a scenario such as the one in the book could actually be feasible in the real world, which is exactly wh y this novel can seem so real and alarming at times. Although scientists in Jurassic Park are able to (or at least be under the allusion that they are able to) harness the powers of biotechnology, they fail in many ways to realize that â€Å"life breaks free. Life expands to new territories. Painfully, perhaps even dangerously. But life finds a way† (Crichton 160). This is exactly the reason why Jurassic Park ends up having so many problems down the road (dinosaurs switching genders, mating, escaping the island, etc.) Just as the scientists in the novel, we believe that nature is a force which we can easily overcome. But with this sort of arrogant attitude at the forefront of today’s technological advances, our fate is most likely headed towards the direction of the characters in the novel who shared these same alarming qualities. The mindset of the western culture has always been that we can eventually come to understand the natural world through science. However, it is rare that scientists today stop and think about the fact that just because they have the ability do to something, does not necessarily mean they should. Many new technological advances have become quite controversial for this reason. For example, food and animal cloning is now a possibility through the use of biotechnology and DNA manipulation, technology very similar to what we see scientists using to create the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park. And much like the technology in the novel, food and animal cloning may prove to be more trouble than it’s worth. While animal cloning does have the potential to feed more people than ever before, there is a major drawback that could lead to a reduction of the gene pool. Such a factor could lead to numerous unpredictable consequences. Upon reviewing the pros and cons of this new technology, the Europe an Group on Ethics in Science and New Technology (EGE) found that â€Å"considering the level of suffering and health problems of surrogate dams and animal clones, [they] had doubts as to whether cloning for food was justified† (Petetin 297). This again comes back to the idea that just because humans now have the ability to defy the natural world, doesn’t mean these acts are justified. These unnecessary advances, just as the creation of dinosaurs, are superfluous, ignorant, and irresponsible. Although the government is currently focusing on the economic considerations of this matter, they have failed to take any precautionary measures. Based on the contents of the novel, we know that when scientific regulations are failed to be made, scientists begin to experiment into uncharted waters and put more than just their own lives in danger. These scientists have what Ian Malcolm would refer to as â€Å"thintelligence. They see the immediate situation. They think narrowly an d they call it being focused. They dont see the surround. They dont see the consequences† (Crichton 284). Man has evolved to have a burning desire to be in control. We are constantly trying to manipulate the world around us in order to make it just how we like. But is the ability to create other life forms really a skill that the human race needs to add to their list of tricks? The line needs to be drawn somewhere so that nature can do what nature does best, but it appears that humanity will never be satisfied. Not only do scientists wish to be in control of life itself, but also the very soil on which we stand. Geoengineering, the deliberate large-scale manipulation of an environmental process that affects the earths climate, is among the latest in controversial technology. We are so worried about the welfare of our planet as we are consistently attempting to ‘fix’ the many environmental issues humans have caused. But we rarely take on the idea that â€Å"the planet has survived everything, in its time. It will certainly survive us† (Crichton 368). While geoengineering might assist our earth in areas such as the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, â€Å"unregulated research projects could have undesirable and unexpected effects on ecosystems and human livelihoods† (Lin 677). This sounds alarmingly similar to the situation we see in Jurassic Park: a private company having a scientific heyday all their own, and eventually leading to life threatening consequences . Just as Hammond failed in his attempt to recreate a Jurassic environment from millions of years ago, we will consistently fail as we attempt to alter our ever-changing and powerful earth. Through the story of Jurassic Park, we see the many threats modern technology imposes. However, we must realize that technology is not the villain here, but rather, humans are. We have lost our humility before God and our trust in the natural world’s ability to carry on without our help. Discovery is not necessary at this point; quite differently, â€Å"discovery is always rape of the natural world. Always† (Crichton 284). And although scientists such as those in Jurassic Park can be irresponsible at times, we are just as easy to blame for allowing them to carry on. We must come to our senses and realize that cloning should be left to the sci-fi movies, the alteration of our earth should be left up to nature’s responsibilities, and â€Å"perhaps extinct animals should be left extinct† (Crichton 189). Through his suspenseful writing talents, Crichton permits readers to dream beyond the natural world, and through the promise of science, we see how easily the se dreams can become a reality. As readers learn more about the wonders of biotechnology throughout Jurassic Park, they get a sense of the looming concern Crichton feels for our recent scientific advances. Whether it’s by the cloning of life forms, the manipulation of our environment, or the creation of animals from millions of years ago, it is clear that scientists are in way over their heads. We must regain our respect for the earth’s natural ways. For nature is not our toy, and unlike the scientists in the novel, we must not be surprised when the electric fences of our earth no longer have power, and our beloved computers are no longer in control. Works Cited Crichton, Michael. Jurassic Park: A Novel. New York: Knopf, 1990. Print. Lin, Albert C. â€Å"Does Geoengineering Present A Moral Hazard?.† Ecology Law Quarterly 40.3 (2013): 673-712. Academic Search Premier. Web 15 Jan. 2014. Petetin, Ludivine. â€Å"The Revival of Modern Agricultural Biotechnology By The UK Government: What Role For Animal Cloning?.† European Food Feed Law Review 7.6 (2012): 296-311. Academic Search Premier. Web. 15 Jan. 2014.